The Readlist: June 2016

One word for you this month: disappointment. With the vast majority of books (we’re talking 99%) I will always keep them after reading them even though the space to store them is somewhat lacking. I always feel like finishing that book is a little achievement, a tick against your existence and should be added to your bookshelf as a display of your personality. Both books I read this month I immediately donated to charity shops when I finished them which should show how much I hated them.

The Shining Girls by Lauren Beukes

I’d been sitting on this book for a while and according to the receipt I found within its pages, I’d been in possession of it since summer 2013. The premise had intrigued me. At that time I read a lot of crime fiction and a plot revolving around a time-travelling serial killer sounded very original and it’d had some good reviews. Sadly, mine won’t be joining them.

With any thriller or crime novel the real aim is to make it into a page turner – a plot deep enough and interesting enough with strong characters that keeps you coming back for more. The Shining Girls fails spectacularly because its timeline fails to make it coherent enough to be a un-put-a-downable read. Obviously this was always going to be a struggle with a time travelling serial killer, but too many time jumps are placed at seemingly random intervals and there’s *too* many (in number) time jumps to keep you hooked. There’s two main time periods followed – those of the killer, and those of a failed former victim who’s looking for the truth. Between them there are then tens of other time frames, jumping around, with other victims and other characters appearing sporadically. Admittedly, the timeline does even out towards the final quarter of the book and my interest did pique but it was too little too late for me. An interesting concept, poorly delivered.

The Girl On The Train by Paula Hawkins

Oh, look what it is! Clearly, I’m very #mainstream this month and finally got round to reading one of the hot books from the past few years (we can thank a charity book stall for this, picked it up in hardback for £1!). It’s the classic premise here that Agatha Christie made famous (she was quite obsessed with trains in hindsight, which reminds me of this great Grandma’s House moment), seeing something through the windows on a train.

The protagonist here is deeply flawed, something we learn in great detail as her life story unravels alongside those of the other characters. In essence, she sees this perfect couple from her train window everyday and then *bam* she’s sees the woman kissing another man who isn’t her boyfriend. The rest of the plot spirals from there.

It’s time for my admissions: I have a deep rooted hatred for novels told in a diary format which aren’t really diaries at all. I can cope with a diary as long as its done properly but this purely used the format so it can avoid creating a tangible story thread and timeframe and easily switch between different characters. In my eyes this is lazy. Listing a date and either morning/afternoon/evening and then having the character’s internal monologue would be fine but it strays from this. It’s not a diary in the classic sense, its presented as what that character’s thinking at that time, and yet, half the time, is presented as if the events are happening in real time. Make your mind up! Is it a diary? A first person narrative? What do you want it to be?

My other issue is that it’s deathly boring and entirely predictable. Oh, look, a person just so happens to be unable to remember the events of the night when it all happened and she’s the only real witness! The characters aren’t as well layered as the author would have you believe; there’s no real nuances to them other than ‘the alcoholic’, ‘the lonely one’, ‘the paranoid one’ etc. And then BAM everything you thought all along and predicted happens at the end anyway, as the big reveal. With a small number of characters the shock factor really isn’t there when it comes to the BIG ending. With a classic murder mystery, say, the small number of characters and motives that each had keeps everything spinning until the end before the climax and everyone shuffles into a room and you’re told who the real killer is. Here, the list of characters is small to begin with and the actual list of suspects is incredibly small – yet, somehow, the book is dragged out to be far longer than it needs to be because there’s a lot of dicking about (not literally).

A film’s due for release later this year so we shall see how that does…

Long Reads & Articles

Neu Jorker I subscribed to the New Yorker for the first time this year having read it online for a few years. Here, the team behind The Onion and the excellent ClickHole have done an *amazing* spoof of the New Yorker, right down to the letters and adverts. It’s the length of an entire magazine! Superb.

Clark Home Counties 1986 saw an interesting addition to the Superman franchise with an incredibly low budget film from a very low budget company. So low budget in fact that they used Milton Keynes to film as New York. This a look around the locations and film’s failure.

 

The Watchlist: June 2016

Films

Just one this month…

departure-ep-peccadillo-pictures

Departure

There was a period of my life when I was around 17 when I seemed to watch an endless succession of coming-of-age films as some kind of distraction from the fact I *should* have been coming of age and wasn’t. There were no wild parties, no flawed romances, no new friends or exciting strangers crossing my path. I was just bumbling through with no epiphanies and hiding my sexuality like any good teen homosexual. I’ve still got a soft spot for the genre and fast forward to 2016 and here’s a gay coming of age film from Peccadillo films. Starring Juliet Stevenson as a mother coming to terms with her crumbling marriage, she’s gone to France to clear their French holiday home and has taken her only son with her. Elliott is played by Alex Lawther who’s a chap you can imagine being in every BBC period drama for the next ten years. And *would you believe it* the son is gay and a handsome stranger happens to cross his path! I jest, I jest. But srsly, Elliott’s this lonely, arty individual who’s working on his poetry and falling in love for the first time (and with carrots). This is actually a really nicely done film. Sure, it doesn’t really go anyway in particular and isn’t going to change the world but it’s a lovingly crafted drama with strong leads.

Television

Orange Is The New Black: S4

One of the most talked about programmes of the past few years returns and people were a little anxious about Season 4. S3 was mocked for being too dull but I have to say I enjoyed it and found it refreshing – the thing that keeps OITNB together is the strength of its characters and S3 focussed on them and showed the background of many of those in the fringes. Clearly, however, producers are worried about how to keep the OITNB train rolling. Characters are great, but there’s only so much you can do within a closed prison environment – their answer? Bring in a shedload of new characters. If the prisoners can’t go out and meet new people let’s bring the people to them. In this season, inmate numbers are up with a fresh intake (it’s a privately run prison now and they’ve doubled capacity), there’s a load of new guards and a new Head Honcho called Piscatella (seemingly the very definition of a gay bear on Grindr). Caputo is up against it as ucleerf6xeaaxfelsual, trying his best with little budget and now under the constraints of a corporation. Once again, the show moves further away from Piper – her storyline has been told, as has Alex’s and Red’s and Burset’s… and the series suffers from having no real focus. Sure the character ensemble is strong but you need something to ‘rally’ the troops as it were and there’s nothing here. As much as enjoyed the pace of S3, S4 didn’t learn from its mistakes.

The start of the series is unbelievably fluffy and, dare I say it, a little dull. There’s lots of plates spinning continuously that aren’t all that interesting. The only thing keeping it going is the ability to bingewatch the show. I firmly believe that if this was a linear TV programme aired weekly audience would drop off a cliff week by week, with some of the end of episode cliffhangers incredibly woeful. It picks up towards the second half and the message of inherent racism in society becomes reinforced well (and tragically) in the final episodes. It’s clear to see, however, that OITNB is little tired – the ending of S4 hints at changes to come though…

The Americans: S1

This show’s very hidden away in the UK. Originally picked up by ITV it was given a Saturday night ‘late’ slot that ended up being pushed back later and later and now it resides on Sky exclusive channel ITV Encore. I was keen to get back into it – I’d heard good things about it, and indeed, raved about it myself when the first season was over our way. Somehow in the intervening years I’d convinced myself that I’d watched the first half of S1 and then dropped out for whatever reason and was going to start with S2 watching instead. I plumped for a full rewatch which was probably wise – it turns out I’d merely seen the pilot and then never watched it again although I loved it. The complete ineptitude of ITV Player back in 2013 must have scared me off committing.

This is a strong drama. The Cold War era is endlessly fascinating but its easy to make TV dramas set around that time full of clichés and unsurprising (saying this, The Game on BBC Two last year was great). The Americans spins the perspective around and goes with the ‘anti-hero’ device, something I’d say is surprisingly under utilised in dramas, as we follow Soviet spies living a life of an American couple. It’s strong, it’s tightly plotted and ensures you commit to the characters – it’s very comparable to Mad Men. (Hopefully it won’t fall into the trap of taking viewers for granted – I fell strongly out of love with Don Draper mid way through the show even when it was trying to convince me to continue worshipping him) Obviously, with any drama, there’s some weak episodes here but overall for a first season it’s a strong start. Some of the flashback scenes do feel a little convoluted and cheesy so I’ll be interested to see if they make a return in S2.

unreal_still

UnREAL

Oh, reality TV. While everyone seemed to be going nuts for Love Island I settled for the other thing everyone was going on about – a TV drama set behind the scenes of a Bachelor-esque reality TV show and written and produced by someone with real life experience of the genre. The two main characters here are Rachel, the great but flawed producer on the show who hates it but is great at her job, and chief producer Julia, played by Constance Zimmer. This became oddly unsettling to me because Julia doesn’t seem all that different from the press officer Zimmer plays in The Newsroom.

Episode 1 is a very strong opener and the series overall isn’t terrible but the show clearly thinks it’s far more clever and different than it is in reality – “look, our protagonist works on a TV show that belittles women and makes them look like man hungry objects but wears a ‘This Is What A Feminist Looks Like’ t-shirt for two episodes!” – and yet falls into the same dull traps as any dirty big American TV show. Airing on Lifestyle over there, a network not exactly known for strong dramas (indeed this was their first series, they took a stab in the dark greenlighting this), they viewed S1 almost as a pilot within itself. This interview with the show’s producer in the New Yorker is worth a read. It gets very spoiler heavy half way through so tread carefully.

disparue

The Disappearance

This month’s foreign drama of choice is this French family thriller with the classic device of ‘young girl disappears’. So far, so dull… and yet The Disappearance gets so many things right. The ensemble cast is incredibly strong and particularly Alix Poisson as the girl’s mother. For a show that follows so many TV mystery tropes (the parents aren’t perfect, the brother’s a little mysterious, there’s an Uncle, there’s a boyfriend, there’s infidelity, there’s a male and female cop duo) it feels remarkably original. It’s a real shame, however, that the female police officer was wasted as a character. Every seed that was sown about her personal life was forgotten about quickly and yet she gave the impression of being a far more intriguing and layered character than divorced-male-cop-with-mildly-rebellious-plot-device-daughter. There’s enough red herrings to keep you hooked and armchair detectives will feel satisfied. Fans of Broadchurch or The Missing will love this and it’s far superior to the former.

City In The Sky

If there’s one thing that TV doesn’t need another of, it’s a transport documentary. You can’t move for them in the schedules – when one on the London underground finishes, there’ll be on on Stansted Airport round the corner. That said I (and obviously many others!) can’t get enough of them. City In The Sky tries to do something different with the air travel documentary and focusses on the elements on flight – the preparation and take off, the journey itself and the landing. The series is so called because its estimated that at any given time there’s a whopping 1.2m people in the sky toing and froing between destinations and the ‘city’ is expected to double in size in the next two decades. There’s very little here that I haven’t seen explored before in other documentaries and yet it comes across as remarkably fresh, in part because the two presenters, Dallas Campbell and mathematician Dr Hannah Fry, are extremely likeable. They’re not telling you things but exploring it with you and holding your hand along the way. I do detest the ‘hip’ method of the presenters “texting” each other throughout each episode though – this isn’t an episode of Hollyoaks.

p03szkr1Mum

There was a lot of people on Twitter claiming this was the best sitcom since sliced bread. The most startlingly thing for me was its similarity to Simon Amstell’s impeccable Grandma’s House – even the house the episodes revolve in looks more or less identical! Just by some happy coincidence all the characters happen to have popped round on the same day and everything falls into place from there. This is a sitcom that thrives on the mundane – it’s slow, it’s ploddy, it’s awkward, it’s in real time and successfully manages to be a good mirror for real life. Poor old Mum puts up with crap because it’s easier than arguing (isn’t that always the way? Anything for a quiet life, eh) and the characters we meet in Episode 1 are the same as those in episode 6 but we’ve learnt far more about their character, their nuances and everyone isn’t what they seem on the surface. I hate to use the overused onion analogy but their is a bit of layer pulling going on here. Kelly is a masterpiece.

Love, Nina

Helena Bonham Carter in something not directed or produced by Tim Burton – what a treat. I enjoyed this; a very light BBC One sitcom.

Panorama: The Orlando Massacre

Kudos to the production team for focussing on those inside rather than the gunman. This is the story of the clubgoers and their retelling of events inside Pulse that night. I’m not ashamed to say I cried watching this.

The Readlist: May 2016

I’ve been a little bit busier this month than usual so haven’t read as heavily, meaning there’s only really one thing worth telling you about…

Going To Sea In A Sieve by Danny Baker

I feel like Danny Baker is a name very familiar to people over 35 (to the point when some people basically worship at his feet) but with me he’s a man I’ve barely come across. I’m aware of his work but have never really listened to him, wasn’t around in the heyday of the 90s when he was at his peak and of course never watched him on his plethora of TV shows. In short, my introduction to Danny Baker has purely been through word of mouth and Cradle To The Grave, last year’s BBC Two sitcom. On a whim I purchased his first autobiography (the basis for the sitcom) having heard good things and I am incredibly glad I did. It is, hands down, one of the best autobiographies I’ve ever read.

It feels a bit odd to type the sentence ‘Danny Baker is a great, witty writer’ because I feel like I’m a guy late to the party who’s stating the obvious. He is though, capisce? Danny holds no qualms in not being massively modest or self deprecating, he knows he’s good at his job but has never forgotten where he came from. Going To Sea In A Sieve follows his early life in a council flat in 1970s East London and his adventures post school. He had so many adventures, so many jobs and met so many people in such a short space of time that I was around 70% of the way through the book when he suddenly mentioned his age again and was momentarily stunned: the events he details all happened pre-21! What a life to lead for a teenager and a far cry from the very life I am leading now, in a cul-de-sac in a sleepy market town.

dannybaker-1200x750

I appreciate you could always say “it’s your own fault if you’re not living a full life” and I can see your argument but with Danny he just happened to be living through his teen years in London. As a result at the time he didn’t appreciate how in the midst of cultural history he was. The number of famous musicians he met as they were climbing the ladder, the amount of incredibly rare vinyl records he came into contact with worth thousands of pounds now and the situations he found himself in. But, I suppose, that’s life really – you’re never truly aware of the good times you’re having until after the event.

This is an astonishing book and one I heartily recommend to everybody – I’ve read some really poor media showbiz autobiographies in my time (*cough* Scott Mills) but this incredible. I both want to read the second book, Going Off Alarming, immediately and also desperately want to save it as a treat for the future me after having read some terrible books.

Long reads and articles

The 96 A personal look at the Hillsborough disaster and it’s wider implications in British history

What Are The Odds? Betting shops are incredibly prevalent on British high streets, often with the same company have numerous branches within spitting distance of each other due to gambling machine regulation. Rather than focussing on the customers this focuses on the overworked staff and the fatal consequences of company expansion and cost cutting.

Cbeebies A God-send for parents, this is a look behind the polka dot curtain of Britain’s most loved TV channel.

oOooOOOooo A look at the hidden profession from the perspective of someone who does it for a living – ghostwriting.

It’s Britney, bitch A public meltdown and a Las vegas residency: those are the headlines of the last decade but is she ready to reclaim her life for herself?

Obamagraph The white House’s chief photographer on life with Obama and life through the lens

Sykeidelic Even with the might of Global behind him, Nathan Sykes has still struggled to forge a tangible career of his own and still lives in the shadow of his former boyband. This is his story of the transformation from 1 of 5 to 1 of 1.

Slave A better life in Scotland?

 

 

The Watchlist: May 2016

Back again and a distinct lack of films this month compared to April…

Films

Blue Jasmine

My English teacher back in A Level tried to convince us to watch this due to its striking similarities to A Streetcar Named Desire, one of our exam texts. It’s clear to see that those links run deep here with former socialite Jasmine rocking up at her working class sisters having lost everything, and suffering from the same kind of mental health issues as Blanche Dubois. Shockingly, for someone who’s arty and liberal, this is the first Woody Allen film I’ve ever seen and in all honesty probably isn’t the best one to choose as an introduction to his work. I mean, that wasn’t my aim watching this, it just ended up that way so I will try and dive into some more Allen as the year progresses. A solid film but nothing special – it basically asks the age old film questions, “who do you want to be?” and “what is happiness?” in a slightly more contemporary way.

bluejasmine_2675152b

Mermaids

Cher and Cher alike! I worked out that she would have been in her mid-40s when this was filmed and released which was very surprising to me. She turned 70 this year! Unbelievable. Anyway, this is the first film I’ve watched Cher in and that was undoubtedly my main draw to this. She plays a single mother constantly running away from her mistakes, upping sticks and dragging her two children half way across the country in the process. Cher’s strong, as are the child actors featured too but that can’t distract from how dull, unnecessarily slow and heavy the plot can feel. Extra time in the edit suite and a good portion could be done away with easily to give it a more rounded, pacier feel. It hasn’t scared me off Cher films forever but I was largely unimpressed.

Television

Storyville

  • Dance With A Serial Killer
  • Tabloid: Sex In Chains

I find it very easy when watching things on demand to immediately reach for a box set drama or comedy rather than a documentary, possibly because they’re not as prominent in search or they’re spoken of less on social media. With iPlayer there’s often swathes of archive documentaries available to view, in part due to the fact a lot of them are shown as filler at 2am on BBC Four and are automatically added to the service. I watched a lot of Storyville and Timeshift documentaries as a teenager without Netflitumblr_ltqfcbc0lw1r2jvaoo1_500x so it was nice to leap back into bed with a few Storyville documentaries.

The first I watched this month traces a French investigator following his gut instinct to apprehend a serial killer; the second is about a woman I had no idea existed but those over 50+ almost certainly will. Model Joyce McKinney became obsessed with her Mormon boyfriend and tried to kidnap him, tying him up in a Dorset cottage and sleeping with him continuously. It became a tabloid sensation as you’d imagine. The interesting thing with Storyville is that the documentaries never have a format – they’re all individual, different lengths and often co-produced with other countries’ broadcasters. Tabloid: Sex In Chains is presented as a talking head docu, tracing Joyce’s life. The mormon neglected to be part of the documentary but his side of the story is explored and journalists who worked on the story at the time also feature. There’s also a fascinating insight into her life post-media sensation; she never found love and tried to live her life in solitude as much as possible. Her life takes an almost sad turn towards the end of the documentary with events involving cloned dogs and all sorts. Bizarre but fascinating.

Blue Eyes

This has been a fairly strong Scandi-noir drama which made a conscious effort to be relevant to the current political happenings in Europe with the rise of the far-right in many countries, including our own. The final few episodes of this are very explosive, however, the political aftermath itself (politics and terrorism run concurrently through the show) is a little difficult to follow. The finale comes to a head on election night with all political factions  continuing to fight, shown in the last twenty minutes of this in a rather rushed fashion leaving it all a bit openended. It looks highly unlikely there’s to be a second series but at least we met lovely Simon though, eh?

cunkos-01Cunk on Shakespeare

If you’re not aware of Philomena Cunk I demand you get on YouTube immediately. A feature of Charlie Brooker’s Wipe series, this was Diane Morgan’s first standalone programme as the character. Her self serious narration and interview techniques are some of the funniest things on television these days and it’d be great if the BBC viewed this as a pilot and greenlit some more episodes. An interesting look at how they made the programme was posted online: in essence, it’s all improvised and they’ve got enough material left over to sink a battleship.

Grace And Frankie

I adored the first series and rejoined Netflix (I took a break back in February) to watch Season 2. In all honesty, I’d forgotten about the entire dynamic behind the show beyond Grace, Frankie and the ex-husbands so the way it gently reintroduced the children (oh them! etc.) and beauty business (oh that! etc) was appreciated. It continued in the same vein as S1 and didn’t try to reinvent itself, continuing to be gently funny and feature a healthy amount of the ever affable Lily Tomlin with her frankly glorious bright eyed smile. This isn’t a laugh a second network comedy, it’s more deep than that but it does contain some fabulous lines. As always it’s great to see older woman portrayed on screen as something other than doddery old fools or bit part players – G&F is about them and proudly so, and isn’t afraid to talk about sex for older generations either (yam lube!)

05frankie1-master768

Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt

This seems to be real marmite comedy over on Twitter – for every person who loves this there’s another who detests it and was never able to get into it. Season 1 had a strong start but some incredibly weak episodes and a overall poor second half even with Jon Hamm and Tina Fey in it.* Thankfully this sustains a decent level throughout and contains the occasional killer line that Tina Fey and the team of the writers are all known for through 30 Rock. It’s nice to see Tobias’ character develop but I still really struggle to appreciate Lillian as a character though – I find she’s too often the same joke or plot device regurgitated in each episode.

*as an aside, having now seen the OJ Simpson drama earlier in the year I now understand that Tina Fey’s lawyer character was a direct parody of Marcia Clark!

Rita S3

I think I’m right in thinking S3 was a Netflix co-production, having proved popular on the streaming service but initially canned by its original network. A lot has changed in Rita’s life – she’s newly single and son Jeppe has moved out which means she’s now alone in her house, rattling around. Episode 2 really highlights this beautifully and the worries that Rita has now she’s single and alone. An elderly spinster teacher who has taught at the school since forever dies suddenly and staff membdownloaders struggle to write a eulogy for her: it turns out nobody really knew her. The end of episode where former pupils attend her funeral and sing her praises cements to Rita that she has had an impact on people’s lives and will be remembered regardless what happens. Rita is also (in true Rita fashion) on a one woman crusade to change the school for the better and ensure those who need extra help get it.

This is the final series of the show, sadly, but I’ve really enjoyed watching it over the past year. A nice soft drama with really great comic moments which doesn’t stick to stereotypes to portray characters. Of course, having a young gay character in Jeppe helps too!

Going Forward

A spin off the darkly funny Getting On set in an NHS hospital, Going Forward sees Jo Brand return without Vicki Pepperdine and Joanna Scanlan. As far as I understand, Brand wasn’t interested in doing the show in America and left them to their own devices and decided to nurse this baby (no pun intended) herself. For the first time we see Kim Wilde’s family (her husband is Omid Djalili) and her new role working for a private home help firm but still under the strain she was before as she tries to help others on a limited budget and with considerable time constraints. The series is largely improvised, which, although impressive, is probably its downfall and led to quite a few scenes feeling like repeats of those from a previous episode (notably those inside the taxi). It could be tighter and it could be funnier but that’s not to say it wasn’t good, although it did fall into the trap of introducing a TV trope in the form of the slightly scatty Aunt. Overall a solid 6/10 and a welcome return for Hillary at the end rounded it off!

The Readlist: April 2016

The Man In The High Castle by Philip K. Dick

71ts-gujujl-_sl1171_I watched the first episode of the Amazon Prime adaptation and thought to myself “no, stop!” and decided to read the book first instead. Alternative history is a genre that’s always fascinated me but I’ve never taken the plunge and read one, probably due to the fact I feel like I need a certain base level knowledge of a certain event/period before I can and, even though I have a History A Level, I felt I was probably lacking the prerequisite.

TMITHC is based around the notion of the Nazis and Japan winning WWII and it’s startling to think that this book was written just fifteen years after VE Day. Imagine George Orwell’s 1984 meets Joseph Heller’s Catch 22 and The Wizard Of Oz and you’re kind of there with this book . It focuses on individual characters and their first person narratives, all of which overlap in the end (and most notably one American-born character is so keen to curry the favour of the Japanese now living in San Fransico and as his leaders that he thinks like them), and the search for ‘The Man In The High Castle’ who has written  a piece of literature where the Allies win the war instead. I can understand that some may find this novel ever so slightly confusing (once you’ve read Catch 22 I think you become open to anything) and certain parts need a bit of a run-up but I thoroughly enjoyed it.

I found this novel incredibly refreshing in its portrayal of a WWII result turned on its head for one reason: the Nazis aren’t the focus. Being in Europe our entire notion of WWII is the Nazis, Hitler and their rise and fall from power. Philip K Dick, as an American writer, focuses primarily on Japan and their takeover of the West coast of the USA (the country has been split in three, with the West given to the Japanese, the East to the Nazis and a no-man’s land created in the middle). America obviously has more of a focus on Japan given the events of Pearl Harbour, but as a European I found it very refreshing to read it without the Nazis being a key focus. They do lurk in the background and aren’t totally ignored as most of the characters are in two minds as to whether they are in fact better off under the Japanese rule or whether they would prefer to be on the East coast with the innovations of the Nazis, but it’s made clear that both sides have taken very different routes since WWII. There’s also the constant fear of Jews being discovered and sent to new concentration camps which have been set up near New York.

TMITHC also introduced me to my new favourite phrase, ‘a pot pourri of pointlessness’, which went straight in my Twitter bio.

Swan Song by Edmund Crispin

I took a punt a while ago and bought a set of Gervase Fen novels and it’s one of the best decisions I’ve made – they’re joyous. Focusing on an amateur detective/university don, the erudite but lumbering Fen, they’re set in and around wartime Oxford. I’ve read four of the novels so far and aside from one which involves government spies in its plot, the war itself is barely mentioned – it just so happens that they were written as being set in the present and at the time a war was on, rarely being used as a direct plot device.

Crispin keeps the time periods in each novel brief – the goings on rarely happen over a period of time longer than week and during one book, The Moving Toyshop, the plot is wrapped up in just over 24 hours. These books are witty, clever and knowing, occasionally breaking the fourth wall with a glorious knowing wink, far more obtuse than Christie’s inclusion of Ariadne Oliver but better for it.

I wouldn’t say this is my favourite Fen novel but it’s certainly enjoyable and the payoff at the end is incredibly clever. These books are hugely satisfying and great fun to read – you’ll love them if you like a classic murder mystery, and (dare I say it) are far more fun than anything Agatha Christie of Dorothy L Sayers ever wrote.

Long reads & articles

I ❤ Jackie Tyler As a Doctor Who loving pre-teen, a magazine created precisely for my audience was a Godsend and I have fond memories of reading Doctor Who Adventures. The inclusion of a pocket FM radio as a free gift meant so much to me as a radio obsessed child, too! One of the team members involved with its launch looks back on ten glorious years. I even remember some of the page spreads included in the post!

Marcia With The People vs. OJ Simpson finishing, here’s a great interview with Marcia Clark.

Top Of The Nots Peter Robinson on the moments in pop music that *almost* happened.

Monica Jon Ronson revisits Monica Lewinsky from the perspective of his hit book, So You’ve Been Publicly Shamed?

All Fun & Games How Hasbro exploited the Magdalene women

Achoo! What happens when your video goes viral?

Shitpic Ever wondered why so many viral pictures and memes shared on Facebook and Twitter look like they’ve been faxed in and photocopied on a printer with little ink left? This is why.

The Watchlist: April 2016

Woah now, this is a bit late so bear with me while I try and cast my mind back to what my opinion was on something I watched nearly two months ago…

Films

The Lady In The Van

My Mother went to the cinema for the first time in over a decade to see this so I felt almost obligated to watch it at some point so I could also say “ever so good!” in the same way my Mother ends up describing everything she’s ever liked, ever. We don’t go in for detailed plot analysis in this family, it’s just a case of boredom or self-congratulation on sitting through a film and mildly enjoying it.

the-lady-in-the-van-04-1

Based on a true story, this sees Maggie Smith as the aforementioned Lady in the Van parked outside Alan Bennet’s not so humble abode in London (it’s not a mansion, but by today’s standards it appears sizeable). Featuring two Alans in many scenes (utilising the same method as Angela Lansbury in one of the GREATEST episodes of Murder, She Wrote where she also plays her cousin Emma, aka filming everything twice and splicing it together like magic), and cameos from each of the original History Boys cast this is a really lovely British film. Nothing strenuous, softly funny and touching too. One you can happily watch with your nan.

Quartet

Of course it would be a *ridiculous* suggestion to say I merely watched this film because I knew Luke Newberry was in it, but indeed, the truth will out. In reality he’s barely in it but plays some cockney, rap loving youth who I struggled to find endearing but then seems to bizarrely change character towards the end and become Luke Newberry again. Go figure. Here he is in a tuxedo.

Screen Shot 2016-04-09 at 22.31.36.png

A retirement home for musicians is a lovely idea, and the film centres around one performer (Maggie Smith again- hiya!) who moves in having not performed for years – let alone with the other members of her old quartet who also happen to be wiling away their time in the country manor they call home. A stellar British cast and another unobtrusive, gently funny Sunday afternoon watch.

Man Up

During the promotional activity for this film, Simon Pegg was very proud of the fact this film was a proper British mid-range rom-com on a mid-range budget. Studios don’t necessarily greenlight such things anymore chooisng to focus on blockbusters or indie films, and we’re many years away from the days when Hugh Grant was in them all. Man Up has what I’d describe as a C-list British cast – actors and actresses you recognise instantly but struggle to place (“wasn’t he in Gavin & Stacey for three episodes?”). It’s not a terrible film but could easily have been far, far better if they’d bothered to put some more jokes in. By far the biggest issue for me though was that Simon Pegg’s character just wasn’t *at all* likeable. This rom-com wants you to feel the same affinity with both characters on the date but Simon Pegg just comes across as an arse, and not in a Hugh-Grant-in-Briget-Jones-unobtainable-arse-way. Seemingly the writers realised this half way through the script and included a scene with him crying in a toilet cubicle as a result but it was too little, too late.

Unknown

I haven’t watched a thriller in ages so plucked for this and it ticked all the boxes. Not overly long, it features the right amount of car chases, “???” moments and trepidation for a Saturday night in. Liam Neeson’s identity has been stolen and he’s desperate to put the pieces back together. When the ‘reveal’ happens its a proper “WOAH NOW” moment. Not the best thriller in the world by any means, but decent.

Sisters

Woo, Tina Fey! I loved 30 Rock but wasn’t massively aware of her other work than Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt and her resemblance to Sarah Palin which will haunt her to the grave. Fey teams up with former co-writer and co-star Amy Poehler (remind me, I should probably commit to Parks & Rec sometime) for a film whose trailer makes it look dreadful. I was genuinely afraid to watch this in case my idea of Fey crumbled in front of my very eyes but plucked for it while aboard a flight. In what came a surprise to me, it’s not actually that terrible. Featuring a solid American comedy cast, there’s plenty of jokes and you never feel like they’re being unnecessarily smutty. You could almost watch it with your parents. However, a good twenty minutes could easily have been shaved from this movie to make it a tighter and a better production.

banner-brooklyn-brooklyn_film_844x476Brooklyn

Headline: I cried at the end of this and had to hide my tears on the plane out of fear that a flight attendant would ask me if I was okay and that’d set me off again. Based on the Colm Tóibín novel (Nick Hornby adapted it for the screen) it sees Saoirse Ronan given the chance of a new life in NYC, away from back-water Ireland. She settles in (living in a boarding house owned by Julie Walters – what a thrill!) and as you’d imagine falls in love with a young Italian stan who I also unashamedly fell in love with. Called back home, Ellis (Ronan) must choose what she wants from life. I was on the edge of my seat during the last twenty minutes of the film during her decision making process. It’s not a film necessarily full of twists and turns, it’s purely a 1h 52m drama full of love, nostalgia and self discovery but crucially it’s never plodding. Adapting this story for the screen could have seen it become an incredibly dull, worthy piece of cinema but it successfully avoids that and any mid-century period tropes that befall many pieces.

Zootopia (Zootropolis)

I watched this in North America so it was Zootopia for me and what an absolute gem this film is. When you don’t have children to entertain your exposure to animated films as an adult is often limited to Christmas and Easter when they’re on BBC One. I’m afraid watching animated Pixar/Disney/Dreamworks films thesedays would somehow rain on the parade of my memories of animated films in my childhood. However, I watched Wreck It Ralph last year and *adored* it and it turns out I adore this too. The attention to detail is astonishing, to the point where I feel a second (slow motion!) watch is warranted – recreating the Western world in animated form and the nuances and brands that are incorporated has fascinated me since Burger King and Gap were incorporated into Shrek 2. Touches that appeal to adults and children viewing an adult world helps create jokes that are funny to all – the annoyance of parking tickets and the sloths running the government agency are brilliant examples.

The overall philosophy behind this film is acceptance of others from different backgrounds, something that children have an inept feel for when young – in fact this film almost serves more as a reminder to the adults than anyone else. Little Jimmy will play with any boy and girl and it’s only through years of being surrounded by casual racism from parents and elders that opinions are hardened and formed. An all star cast, a feel good vibe and a catchy theme song courtesy of Shakira the gazelle cements this film as a new found favourite of mine. zootopia-wallpaper-disneys-zootopia-39294733-1920-1080

Television

Follow The Money

I like my foreign, Scandi-noir drama but BLOODY HELL there’s a lot of it these days. I already feel like I’m behind on most things and then another “must watch Danish thriller” comes along. I heard good reports about this so watched the first two episodes before they disappeared off iPlayer. A few more days passed and I suddenly thought “why should I watch anymore?”. I’d given it two hours of my time and hadn’t thought about it since then so that’s that – I’m moving on. Undoubtedly (as with many dramas) it probably became amazing by episode 6 but alas, FtM’s time for me was up. Kudos for the opening titles though: they were by far the best bit*

*on that note, why is British TV so afraid of great opening title sequences? It feels to me like we can’t wait to get them over with; some shows barely breaking the 30 second mark. Throw up some actors names and a director with some quirky shots and animation and it can set up a show properly, and become a staple. Please Like Me, which I’ve blogged about before, incorporated the opening titles as a key part of the show and I loved it for it.

The Day Today

This is one of those shows continually referenced by people over 30 on Twitter, whereas many people my age would have no idea who Chris Morris is. I’ve always wanted to watch this properly, having loved clips I’d seen and having been a big fan of the Ianucci-Partridge stuff with Rebecca Front, David Schneider and Patrick Marber. I wasn’t disappointed. It’s remarkable how relevant TDT is over twenty years later – it understood the media better than the media understood themselves, seemingly. Times have obviously changed since 1994 with the advent of rolling news and Buzzfeed et al, but the TV tropes it parodies are still very much a part of our viewing today. There’s a piece in one of the first episodes about early citizen journalism, peoplhqdefaulte with camcorders filming events first and phoning for the emergency services later, incredibly prescient of the news media now we live in a world of smartphones and social media.

Also: the DVD is the oddest thing in the world with the most bizarre DVD menu. It’s laborious to get to what you want, but it was all purposely designed that way by Chris Morris himself and there’s a load of hidden Easter eggs to try and find. Admittedly this is difficult viewing on a Mac in 2016 given it was made for a DVD player and remote circa 2004 but clicking around a bit brings up some extras. There’s a list of them here.

The Newsroom S2

This season starts ‘in media res’ (and they said my English Literature A Level would mean nothing to me!) aka in the middle of things. Clearly someone, somewhere has f*cked up big time. Lawyers have been hired to unravel the biggest failing that can ever befall a serious news organisation; the broadcast of categorically untrue news. The pieces come together as the episodes continue, with the usual Aaron Sorkin personal dramas taking place around it. Interestingly, Sorkin must have understood that S2 would need a different feel to it. In the commentary for S1 he was incredibly proud of only using real events in the recent past as the background for each episode and yet BOOM with S2 there’s an entire fake news story that nearly cripples the network (not a spoiler btw, its clear from the beginning).

I was thinking half way through the season whether or not this was a bit dull and worthy. I was enjoying it (although some critics panned the Newsroom) and its almost soap opera-esque delivery of things. In essence the show is just people in a microcosm, like in everyday life dealing with their personal issues and work. I then had the stupid thought of “it’s just people talking really, there’s nothing involving a gun or suspense in this show like other dramas” when within the very episode I was watching that was completely reversed. Also notable is that one of the episodes this season is presented in real time alongside the news broadcast they’re producing. Fairly enjoyable, although as I’ve said before, without a grasp of American politics I’d be completely lost half the time.

Screen Shot 2016-05-01 at 18.26.51.pngFlowers

Spread over a week with an episode at 10pm each night, this dark twisted comedy is like EastEnders on steroids in that “it’s all about faaaaamillllllyyyyy”. Focusing on the Flowers family and the bizarre circumstances that surround them you begin to see that in fact they’re not odd but perfectly normal. They’re just trying to muddle through like the rest of us, putting up with their family members and neighbours like we all do and dealing with all things life throws at us. This is funny – not necessarily LOL territory – but its dark dry wit is great and it opens the show up for a good bingewatch.

At the heart of it is sadness and depression and Flowers does a bizarrely brilliant task of displaying depression on screen as it is in reality. We have a huge tendency in Britain to forget about mental health and not talk about it, going with the “what’s he got to be depressed about?” line or ignoring it completely. Depression can be crippling but equally it can become a part of someone’s life where they have good and bad days. People imagine that if you’re depressed you just sit at home in a chair staring at wall all day without the energy to get up, and, though there is an element of that, many people get up, go out, deal with life’s mundanities and events and continue to feel glum with a weight upon themselves. Flowers shows that. What we learn by the end (in a brilliant fashion – eps 5 & 6 are superb) is that each member has their own sadness and their own battles, but they’re well hidden – as I think truly it is with all of us.

Mr Robot

Bringing down ‘The Man’ is something that almost obsesses some people, with the rest of us walking around in a slave daze to capitalism – so far, so unoriginal. Mr Robot (like The Circle) has one company, E[vil] Corp, who own everything and is the story of their attempted downfall by a hacker group. I’d been meaning to watch this for ages; it had intrigued me when browsing Amazon Prime and then a few months ago I watched a compilation of all Rami Malek’s scenes in a mediocre American sitcom in which he played a teen coming to terms with his sexuality (gay guy watches TV show because a gay guy is in it SHOCK!). I wasn’t particularly aware of his work before then, Googled him and Mr Robot popped up and I think it’s fair to say that this is his breakout role.

He gives an incredible performance but I couldn’t help but be thoroughly disappointed by all the ‘big’ reveals in the final few episodes. They all felt a bit flat and almost as if they’d been borrowed from a soap opera –  there’s a time and place but I just expected more. There’s clearly some weak episodes within the series and the finale didn’t tick many boxes for me (it petered out) but overall the series was about Elliott coming to terms with himself and his mental issues and it delivered this with aplomb. The stand out episode for me would be ep 6 where the ending left me open mouthed. Overall, strong but not amazing. We’ll see what S2 brings.

Screen Shot 2016-04-06 at 21.44.36

Boomers I hadn’t watched the first series of this and I’m definitely regretting it now. Based around three baby boomer couples, this comedy is as well acted and well written as you’d imagine a BBC One comedy to be. You can always tell if something is a BBC One comedy if it uses the word “sex” as a punchline and this definitely falls into that category. It is great though, nice and light, unobtrusive and an easy, funny watch.

Two Doors Down I never saw the original pilot episode from many moons ago but having watched the series I’d rate it as a solid and enjoyable comedy, . Admittedly though, I probably wouldn’t have committed to watching this without the inclusion of a gay couple in it (again, I’m a terrible cliché, I know)

EastEnders this month saw the return of Johnny complete with a new head. The character means an awful lot to me for obvious reasons so I was eager to see his on screen revival. I think it’s fair to say I was far more accepting of Johnny 2.0 than most (he was slated), but it’s a soap opera – people take time to settle in and I believe he now has, although his ForlornFace™ did wear thin after a while.

First Dates this has been a runaway success for Channel 4 in the past eighteen months but Christ on a bike guys, sort out your scheduling. The number of shifts in day and time is verging on ridiculous; show it some love!!!!1!

Blue Eyes This continues to be great Swedish political thriller, with an oddly relevant undertone – the rise of a far right, racist group both politically speaking in an establishment sense and in terms of terror. Adam Lundgren (my future husband of Don’t Ever Wipe Tears fame) is in it and I’m struggling to adjust to him being the bad guy.

People vs. OJ Simpson everyone seemed to be talking about this and rightly so. Flawless from start to finish, this never dropped the ball and there were no weak episodes – incredibly surprising with a US drama or comedy, given most series have at least two! I did read, however, one person critiquing the presentation of Simpson as a snivelling, weak man rather than the strong, tall, charismatic God he was in reality and I think they had a valid point.