The Readlist: May 2016

I’ve been a little bit busier this month than usual so haven’t read as heavily, meaning there’s only really one thing worth telling you about…

Going To Sea In A Sieve by Danny Baker

I feel like Danny Baker is a name very familiar to people over 35 (to the point when some people basically worship at his feet) but with me he’s a man I’ve barely come across. I’m aware of his work but have never really listened to him, wasn’t around in the heyday of the 90s when he was at his peak and of course never watched him on his plethora of TV shows. In short, my introduction to Danny Baker has purely been through word of mouth and Cradle To The Grave, last year’s BBC Two sitcom. On a whim I purchased his first autobiography (the basis for the sitcom) having heard good things and I am incredibly glad I did. It is, hands down, one of the best autobiographies I’ve ever read.

It feels a bit odd to type the sentence ‘Danny Baker is a great, witty writer’ because I feel like I’m a guy late to the party who’s stating the obvious. He is though, capisce? Danny holds no qualms in not being massively modest or self deprecating, he knows he’s good at his job but has never forgotten where he came from. Going To Sea In A Sieve follows his early life in a council flat in 1970s East London and his adventures post school. He had so many adventures, so many jobs and met so many people in such a short space of time that I was around 70% of the way through the book when he suddenly mentioned his age again and was momentarily stunned: the events he details all happened pre-21! What a life to lead for a teenager and a far cry from the very life I am leading now, in a cul-de-sac in a sleepy market town.

dannybaker-1200x750

I appreciate you could always say “it’s your own fault if you’re not living a full life” and I can see your argument but with Danny he just happened to be living through his teen years in London. As a result at the time he didn’t appreciate how in the midst of cultural history he was. The number of famous musicians he met as they were climbing the ladder, the amount of incredibly rare vinyl records he came into contact with worth thousands of pounds now and the situations he found himself in. But, I suppose, that’s life really – you’re never truly aware of the good times you’re having until after the event.

This is an astonishing book and one I heartily recommend to everybody – I’ve read some really poor media showbiz autobiographies in my time (*cough* Scott Mills) but this incredible. I both want to read the second book, Going Off Alarming, immediately and also desperately want to save it as a treat for the future me after having read some terrible books.

Long reads and articles

The 96 A personal look at the Hillsborough disaster and it’s wider implications in British history

What Are The Odds? Betting shops are incredibly prevalent on British high streets, often with the same company have numerous branches within spitting distance of each other due to gambling machine regulation. Rather than focussing on the customers this focuses on the overworked staff and the fatal consequences of company expansion and cost cutting.

Cbeebies A God-send for parents, this is a look behind the polka dot curtain of Britain’s most loved TV channel.

oOooOOOooo A look at the hidden profession from the perspective of someone who does it for a living – ghostwriting.

It’s Britney, bitch A public meltdown and a Las vegas residency: those are the headlines of the last decade but is she ready to reclaim her life for herself?

Obamagraph The white House’s chief photographer on life with Obama and life through the lens

Sykeidelic Even with the might of Global behind him, Nathan Sykes has still struggled to forge a tangible career of his own and still lives in the shadow of his former boyband. This is his story of the transformation from 1 of 5 to 1 of 1.

Slave A better life in Scotland?

 

 

The Watchlist: May 2016

Back again and a distinct lack of films this month compared to April…

Films

Blue Jasmine

My English teacher back in A Level tried to convince us to watch this due to its striking similarities to A Streetcar Named Desire, one of our exam texts. It’s clear to see that those links run deep here with former socialite Jasmine rocking up at her working class sisters having lost everything, and suffering from the same kind of mental health issues as Blanche Dubois. Shockingly, for someone who’s arty and liberal, this is the first Woody Allen film I’ve ever seen and in all honesty probably isn’t the best one to choose as an introduction to his work. I mean, that wasn’t my aim watching this, it just ended up that way so I will try and dive into some more Allen as the year progresses. A solid film but nothing special – it basically asks the age old film questions, “who do you want to be?” and “what is happiness?” in a slightly more contemporary way.

bluejasmine_2675152b

Mermaids

Cher and Cher alike! I worked out that she would have been in her mid-40s when this was filmed and released which was very surprising to me. She turned 70 this year! Unbelievable. Anyway, this is the first film I’ve watched Cher in and that was undoubtedly my main draw to this. She plays a single mother constantly running away from her mistakes, upping sticks and dragging her two children half way across the country in the process. Cher’s strong, as are the child actors featured too but that can’t distract from how dull, unnecessarily slow and heavy the plot can feel. Extra time in the edit suite and a good portion could be done away with easily to give it a more rounded, pacier feel. It hasn’t scared me off Cher films forever but I was largely unimpressed.

Television

Storyville

  • Dance With A Serial Killer
  • Tabloid: Sex In Chains

I find it very easy when watching things on demand to immediately reach for a box set drama or comedy rather than a documentary, possibly because they’re not as prominent in search or they’re spoken of less on social media. With iPlayer there’s often swathes of archive documentaries available to view, in part due to the fact a lot of them are shown as filler at 2am on BBC Four and are automatically added to the service. I watched a lot of Storyville and Timeshift documentaries as a teenager without Netflitumblr_ltqfcbc0lw1r2jvaoo1_500x so it was nice to leap back into bed with a few Storyville documentaries.

The first I watched this month traces a French investigator following his gut instinct to apprehend a serial killer; the second is about a woman I had no idea existed but those over 50+ almost certainly will. Model Joyce McKinney became obsessed with her Mormon boyfriend and tried to kidnap him, tying him up in a Dorset cottage and sleeping with him continuously. It became a tabloid sensation as you’d imagine. The interesting thing with Storyville is that the documentaries never have a format – they’re all individual, different lengths and often co-produced with other countries’ broadcasters. Tabloid: Sex In Chains is presented as a talking head docu, tracing Joyce’s life. The mormon neglected to be part of the documentary but his side of the story is explored and journalists who worked on the story at the time also feature. There’s also a fascinating insight into her life post-media sensation; she never found love and tried to live her life in solitude as much as possible. Her life takes an almost sad turn towards the end of the documentary with events involving cloned dogs and all sorts. Bizarre but fascinating.

Blue Eyes

This has been a fairly strong Scandi-noir drama which made a conscious effort to be relevant to the current political happenings in Europe with the rise of the far-right in many countries, including our own. The final few episodes of this are very explosive, however, the political aftermath itself (politics and terrorism run concurrently through the show) is a little difficult to follow. The finale comes to a head on election night with all political factions  continuing to fight, shown in the last twenty minutes of this in a rather rushed fashion leaving it all a bit openended. It looks highly unlikely there’s to be a second series but at least we met lovely Simon though, eh?

cunkos-01Cunk on Shakespeare

If you’re not aware of Philomena Cunk I demand you get on YouTube immediately. A feature of Charlie Brooker’s Wipe series, this was Diane Morgan’s first standalone programme as the character. Her self serious narration and interview techniques are some of the funniest things on television these days and it’d be great if the BBC viewed this as a pilot and greenlit some more episodes. An interesting look at how they made the programme was posted online: in essence, it’s all improvised and they’ve got enough material left over to sink a battleship.

Grace And Frankie

I adored the first series and rejoined Netflix (I took a break back in February) to watch Season 2. In all honesty, I’d forgotten about the entire dynamic behind the show beyond Grace, Frankie and the ex-husbands so the way it gently reintroduced the children (oh them! etc.) and beauty business (oh that! etc) was appreciated. It continued in the same vein as S1 and didn’t try to reinvent itself, continuing to be gently funny and feature a healthy amount of the ever affable Lily Tomlin with her frankly glorious bright eyed smile. This isn’t a laugh a second network comedy, it’s more deep than that but it does contain some fabulous lines. As always it’s great to see older woman portrayed on screen as something other than doddery old fools or bit part players – G&F is about them and proudly so, and isn’t afraid to talk about sex for older generations either (yam lube!)

05frankie1-master768

Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt

This seems to be real marmite comedy over on Twitter – for every person who loves this there’s another who detests it and was never able to get into it. Season 1 had a strong start but some incredibly weak episodes and a overall poor second half even with Jon Hamm and Tina Fey in it.* Thankfully this sustains a decent level throughout and contains the occasional killer line that Tina Fey and the team of the writers are all known for through 30 Rock. It’s nice to see Tobias’ character develop but I still really struggle to appreciate Lillian as a character though – I find she’s too often the same joke or plot device regurgitated in each episode.

*as an aside, having now seen the OJ Simpson drama earlier in the year I now understand that Tina Fey’s lawyer character was a direct parody of Marcia Clark!

Rita S3

I think I’m right in thinking S3 was a Netflix co-production, having proved popular on the streaming service but initially canned by its original network. A lot has changed in Rita’s life – she’s newly single and son Jeppe has moved out which means she’s now alone in her house, rattling around. Episode 2 really highlights this beautifully and the worries that Rita has now she’s single and alone. An elderly spinster teacher who has taught at the school since forever dies suddenly and staff membdownloaders struggle to write a eulogy for her: it turns out nobody really knew her. The end of episode where former pupils attend her funeral and sing her praises cements to Rita that she has had an impact on people’s lives and will be remembered regardless what happens. Rita is also (in true Rita fashion) on a one woman crusade to change the school for the better and ensure those who need extra help get it.

This is the final series of the show, sadly, but I’ve really enjoyed watching it over the past year. A nice soft drama with really great comic moments which doesn’t stick to stereotypes to portray characters. Of course, having a young gay character in Jeppe helps too!

Going Forward

A spin off the darkly funny Getting On set in an NHS hospital, Going Forward sees Jo Brand return without Vicki Pepperdine and Joanna Scanlan. As far as I understand, Brand wasn’t interested in doing the show in America and left them to their own devices and decided to nurse this baby (no pun intended) herself. For the first time we see Kim Wilde’s family (her husband is Omid Djalili) and her new role working for a private home help firm but still under the strain she was before as she tries to help others on a limited budget and with considerable time constraints. The series is largely improvised, which, although impressive, is probably its downfall and led to quite a few scenes feeling like repeats of those from a previous episode (notably those inside the taxi). It could be tighter and it could be funnier but that’s not to say it wasn’t good, although it did fall into the trap of introducing a TV trope in the form of the slightly scatty Aunt. Overall a solid 6/10 and a welcome return for Hillary at the end rounded it off!

The Readlist: April 2016

The Man In The High Castle by Philip K. Dick

71ts-gujujl-_sl1171_I watched the first episode of the Amazon Prime adaptation and thought to myself “no, stop!” and decided to read the book first instead. Alternative history is a genre that’s always fascinated me but I’ve never taken the plunge and read one, probably due to the fact I feel like I need a certain base level knowledge of a certain event/period before I can and, even though I have a History A Level, I felt I was probably lacking the prerequisite.

TMITHC is based around the notion of the Nazis and Japan winning WWII and it’s startling to think that this book was written just fifteen years after VE Day. Imagine George Orwell’s 1984 meets Joseph Heller’s Catch 22 and The Wizard Of Oz and you’re kind of there with this book . It focuses on individual characters and their first person narratives, all of which overlap in the end (and most notably one American-born character is so keen to curry the favour of the Japanese now living in San Fransico and as his leaders that he thinks like them), and the search for ‘The Man In The High Castle’ who has written  a piece of literature where the Allies win the war instead. I can understand that some may find this novel ever so slightly confusing (once you’ve read Catch 22 I think you become open to anything) and certain parts need a bit of a run-up but I thoroughly enjoyed it.

I found this novel incredibly refreshing in its portrayal of a WWII result turned on its head for one reason: the Nazis aren’t the focus. Being in Europe our entire notion of WWII is the Nazis, Hitler and their rise and fall from power. Philip K Dick, as an American writer, focuses primarily on Japan and their takeover of the West coast of the USA (the country has been split in three, with the West given to the Japanese, the East to the Nazis and a no-man’s land created in the middle). America obviously has more of a focus on Japan given the events of Pearl Harbour, but as a European I found it very refreshing to read it without the Nazis being a key focus. They do lurk in the background and aren’t totally ignored as most of the characters are in two minds as to whether they are in fact better off under the Japanese rule or whether they would prefer to be on the East coast with the innovations of the Nazis, but it’s made clear that both sides have taken very different routes since WWII. There’s also the constant fear of Jews being discovered and sent to new concentration camps which have been set up near New York.

TMITHC also introduced me to my new favourite phrase, ‘a pot pourri of pointlessness’, which went straight in my Twitter bio.

Swan Song by Edmund Crispin

I took a punt a while ago and bought a set of Gervase Fen novels and it’s one of the best decisions I’ve made – they’re joyous. Focusing on an amateur detective/university don, the erudite but lumbering Fen, they’re set in and around wartime Oxford. I’ve read four of the novels so far and aside from one which involves government spies in its plot, the war itself is barely mentioned – it just so happens that they were written as being set in the present and at the time a war was on, rarely being used as a direct plot device.

Crispin keeps the time periods in each novel brief – the goings on rarely happen over a period of time longer than week and during one book, The Moving Toyshop, the plot is wrapped up in just over 24 hours. These books are witty, clever and knowing, occasionally breaking the fourth wall with a glorious knowing wink, far more obtuse than Christie’s inclusion of Ariadne Oliver but better for it.

I wouldn’t say this is my favourite Fen novel but it’s certainly enjoyable and the payoff at the end is incredibly clever. These books are hugely satisfying and great fun to read – you’ll love them if you like a classic murder mystery, and (dare I say it) are far more fun than anything Agatha Christie of Dorothy L Sayers ever wrote.

Long reads & articles

I ❤ Jackie Tyler As a Doctor Who loving pre-teen, a magazine created precisely for my audience was a Godsend and I have fond memories of reading Doctor Who Adventures. The inclusion of a pocket FM radio as a free gift meant so much to me as a radio obsessed child, too! One of the team members involved with its launch looks back on ten glorious years. I even remember some of the page spreads included in the post!

Marcia With The People vs. OJ Simpson finishing, here’s a great interview with Marcia Clark.

Top Of The Nots Peter Robinson on the moments in pop music that *almost* happened.

Monica Jon Ronson revisits Monica Lewinsky from the perspective of his hit book, So You’ve Been Publicly Shamed?

All Fun & Games How Hasbro exploited the Magdalene women

Achoo! What happens when your video goes viral?

Shitpic Ever wondered why so many viral pictures and memes shared on Facebook and Twitter look like they’ve been faxed in and photocopied on a printer with little ink left? This is why.

The Watchlist: April 2016

Woah now, this is a bit late so bear with me while I try and cast my mind back to what my opinion was on something I watched nearly two months ago…

Films

The Lady In The Van

My Mother went to the cinema for the first time in over a decade to see this so I felt almost obligated to watch it at some point so I could also say “ever so good!” in the same way my Mother ends up describing everything she’s ever liked, ever. We don’t go in for detailed plot analysis in this family, it’s just a case of boredom or self-congratulation on sitting through a film and mildly enjoying it.

the-lady-in-the-van-04-1

Based on a true story, this sees Maggie Smith as the aforementioned Lady in the Van parked outside Alan Bennet’s not so humble abode in London (it’s not a mansion, but by today’s standards it appears sizeable). Featuring two Alans in many scenes (utilising the same method as Angela Lansbury in one of the GREATEST episodes of Murder, She Wrote where she also plays her cousin Emma, aka filming everything twice and splicing it together like magic), and cameos from each of the original History Boys cast this is a really lovely British film. Nothing strenuous, softly funny and touching too. One you can happily watch with your nan.

Quartet

Of course it would be a *ridiculous* suggestion to say I merely watched this film because I knew Luke Newberry was in it, but indeed, the truth will out. In reality he’s barely in it but plays some cockney, rap loving youth who I struggled to find endearing but then seems to bizarrely change character towards the end and become Luke Newberry again. Go figure. Here he is in a tuxedo.

Screen Shot 2016-04-09 at 22.31.36.png

A retirement home for musicians is a lovely idea, and the film centres around one performer (Maggie Smith again- hiya!) who moves in having not performed for years – let alone with the other members of her old quartet who also happen to be wiling away their time in the country manor they call home. A stellar British cast and another unobtrusive, gently funny Sunday afternoon watch.

Man Up

During the promotional activity for this film, Simon Pegg was very proud of the fact this film was a proper British mid-range rom-com on a mid-range budget. Studios don’t necessarily greenlight such things anymore chooisng to focus on blockbusters or indie films, and we’re many years away from the days when Hugh Grant was in them all. Man Up has what I’d describe as a C-list British cast – actors and actresses you recognise instantly but struggle to place (“wasn’t he in Gavin & Stacey for three episodes?”). It’s not a terrible film but could easily have been far, far better if they’d bothered to put some more jokes in. By far the biggest issue for me though was that Simon Pegg’s character just wasn’t *at all* likeable. This rom-com wants you to feel the same affinity with both characters on the date but Simon Pegg just comes across as an arse, and not in a Hugh-Grant-in-Briget-Jones-unobtainable-arse-way. Seemingly the writers realised this half way through the script and included a scene with him crying in a toilet cubicle as a result but it was too little, too late.

Unknown

I haven’t watched a thriller in ages so plucked for this and it ticked all the boxes. Not overly long, it features the right amount of car chases, “???” moments and trepidation for a Saturday night in. Liam Neeson’s identity has been stolen and he’s desperate to put the pieces back together. When the ‘reveal’ happens its a proper “WOAH NOW” moment. Not the best thriller in the world by any means, but decent.

Sisters

Woo, Tina Fey! I loved 30 Rock but wasn’t massively aware of her other work than Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt and her resemblance to Sarah Palin which will haunt her to the grave. Fey teams up with former co-writer and co-star Amy Poehler (remind me, I should probably commit to Parks & Rec sometime) for a film whose trailer makes it look dreadful. I was genuinely afraid to watch this in case my idea of Fey crumbled in front of my very eyes but plucked for it while aboard a flight. In what came a surprise to me, it’s not actually that terrible. Featuring a solid American comedy cast, there’s plenty of jokes and you never feel like they’re being unnecessarily smutty. You could almost watch it with your parents. However, a good twenty minutes could easily have been shaved from this movie to make it a tighter and a better production.

banner-brooklyn-brooklyn_film_844x476Brooklyn

Headline: I cried at the end of this and had to hide my tears on the plane out of fear that a flight attendant would ask me if I was okay and that’d set me off again. Based on the Colm Tóibín novel (Nick Hornby adapted it for the screen) it sees Saoirse Ronan given the chance of a new life in NYC, away from back-water Ireland. She settles in (living in a boarding house owned by Julie Walters – what a thrill!) and as you’d imagine falls in love with a young Italian stan who I also unashamedly fell in love with. Called back home, Ellis (Ronan) must choose what she wants from life. I was on the edge of my seat during the last twenty minutes of the film during her decision making process. It’s not a film necessarily full of twists and turns, it’s purely a 1h 52m drama full of love, nostalgia and self discovery but crucially it’s never plodding. Adapting this story for the screen could have seen it become an incredibly dull, worthy piece of cinema but it successfully avoids that and any mid-century period tropes that befall many pieces.

Zootopia (Zootropolis)

I watched this in North America so it was Zootopia for me and what an absolute gem this film is. When you don’t have children to entertain your exposure to animated films as an adult is often limited to Christmas and Easter when they’re on BBC One. I’m afraid watching animated Pixar/Disney/Dreamworks films thesedays would somehow rain on the parade of my memories of animated films in my childhood. However, I watched Wreck It Ralph last year and *adored* it and it turns out I adore this too. The attention to detail is astonishing, to the point where I feel a second (slow motion!) watch is warranted – recreating the Western world in animated form and the nuances and brands that are incorporated has fascinated me since Burger King and Gap were incorporated into Shrek 2. Touches that appeal to adults and children viewing an adult world helps create jokes that are funny to all – the annoyance of parking tickets and the sloths running the government agency are brilliant examples.

The overall philosophy behind this film is acceptance of others from different backgrounds, something that children have an inept feel for when young – in fact this film almost serves more as a reminder to the adults than anyone else. Little Jimmy will play with any boy and girl and it’s only through years of being surrounded by casual racism from parents and elders that opinions are hardened and formed. An all star cast, a feel good vibe and a catchy theme song courtesy of Shakira the gazelle cements this film as a new found favourite of mine. zootopia-wallpaper-disneys-zootopia-39294733-1920-1080

Television

Follow The Money

I like my foreign, Scandi-noir drama but BLOODY HELL there’s a lot of it these days. I already feel like I’m behind on most things and then another “must watch Danish thriller” comes along. I heard good reports about this so watched the first two episodes before they disappeared off iPlayer. A few more days passed and I suddenly thought “why should I watch anymore?”. I’d given it two hours of my time and hadn’t thought about it since then so that’s that – I’m moving on. Undoubtedly (as with many dramas) it probably became amazing by episode 6 but alas, FtM’s time for me was up. Kudos for the opening titles though: they were by far the best bit*

*on that note, why is British TV so afraid of great opening title sequences? It feels to me like we can’t wait to get them over with; some shows barely breaking the 30 second mark. Throw up some actors names and a director with some quirky shots and animation and it can set up a show properly, and become a staple. Please Like Me, which I’ve blogged about before, incorporated the opening titles as a key part of the show and I loved it for it.

The Day Today

This is one of those shows continually referenced by people over 30 on Twitter, whereas many people my age would have no idea who Chris Morris is. I’ve always wanted to watch this properly, having loved clips I’d seen and having been a big fan of the Ianucci-Partridge stuff with Rebecca Front, David Schneider and Patrick Marber. I wasn’t disappointed. It’s remarkable how relevant TDT is over twenty years later – it understood the media better than the media understood themselves, seemingly. Times have obviously changed since 1994 with the advent of rolling news and Buzzfeed et al, but the TV tropes it parodies are still very much a part of our viewing today. There’s a piece in one of the first episodes about early citizen journalism, peoplhqdefaulte with camcorders filming events first and phoning for the emergency services later, incredibly prescient of the news media now we live in a world of smartphones and social media.

Also: the DVD is the oddest thing in the world with the most bizarre DVD menu. It’s laborious to get to what you want, but it was all purposely designed that way by Chris Morris himself and there’s a load of hidden Easter eggs to try and find. Admittedly this is difficult viewing on a Mac in 2016 given it was made for a DVD player and remote circa 2004 but clicking around a bit brings up some extras. There’s a list of them here.

The Newsroom S2

This season starts ‘in media res’ (and they said my English Literature A Level would mean nothing to me!) aka in the middle of things. Clearly someone, somewhere has f*cked up big time. Lawyers have been hired to unravel the biggest failing that can ever befall a serious news organisation; the broadcast of categorically untrue news. The pieces come together as the episodes continue, with the usual Aaron Sorkin personal dramas taking place around it. Interestingly, Sorkin must have understood that S2 would need a different feel to it. In the commentary for S1 he was incredibly proud of only using real events in the recent past as the background for each episode and yet BOOM with S2 there’s an entire fake news story that nearly cripples the network (not a spoiler btw, its clear from the beginning).

I was thinking half way through the season whether or not this was a bit dull and worthy. I was enjoying it (although some critics panned the Newsroom) and its almost soap opera-esque delivery of things. In essence the show is just people in a microcosm, like in everyday life dealing with their personal issues and work. I then had the stupid thought of “it’s just people talking really, there’s nothing involving a gun or suspense in this show like other dramas” when within the very episode I was watching that was completely reversed. Also notable is that one of the episodes this season is presented in real time alongside the news broadcast they’re producing. Fairly enjoyable, although as I’ve said before, without a grasp of American politics I’d be completely lost half the time.

Screen Shot 2016-05-01 at 18.26.51.pngFlowers

Spread over a week with an episode at 10pm each night, this dark twisted comedy is like EastEnders on steroids in that “it’s all about faaaaamillllllyyyyy”. Focusing on the Flowers family and the bizarre circumstances that surround them you begin to see that in fact they’re not odd but perfectly normal. They’re just trying to muddle through like the rest of us, putting up with their family members and neighbours like we all do and dealing with all things life throws at us. This is funny – not necessarily LOL territory – but its dark dry wit is great and it opens the show up for a good bingewatch.

At the heart of it is sadness and depression and Flowers does a bizarrely brilliant task of displaying depression on screen as it is in reality. We have a huge tendency in Britain to forget about mental health and not talk about it, going with the “what’s he got to be depressed about?” line or ignoring it completely. Depression can be crippling but equally it can become a part of someone’s life where they have good and bad days. People imagine that if you’re depressed you just sit at home in a chair staring at wall all day without the energy to get up, and, though there is an element of that, many people get up, go out, deal with life’s mundanities and events and continue to feel glum with a weight upon themselves. Flowers shows that. What we learn by the end (in a brilliant fashion – eps 5 & 6 are superb) is that each member has their own sadness and their own battles, but they’re well hidden – as I think truly it is with all of us.

Mr Robot

Bringing down ‘The Man’ is something that almost obsesses some people, with the rest of us walking around in a slave daze to capitalism – so far, so unoriginal. Mr Robot (like The Circle) has one company, E[vil] Corp, who own everything and is the story of their attempted downfall by a hacker group. I’d been meaning to watch this for ages; it had intrigued me when browsing Amazon Prime and then a few months ago I watched a compilation of all Rami Malek’s scenes in a mediocre American sitcom in which he played a teen coming to terms with his sexuality (gay guy watches TV show because a gay guy is in it SHOCK!). I wasn’t particularly aware of his work before then, Googled him and Mr Robot popped up and I think it’s fair to say that this is his breakout role.

He gives an incredible performance but I couldn’t help but be thoroughly disappointed by all the ‘big’ reveals in the final few episodes. They all felt a bit flat and almost as if they’d been borrowed from a soap opera –  there’s a time and place but I just expected more. There’s clearly some weak episodes within the series and the finale didn’t tick many boxes for me (it petered out) but overall the series was about Elliott coming to terms with himself and his mental issues and it delivered this with aplomb. The stand out episode for me would be ep 6 where the ending left me open mouthed. Overall, strong but not amazing. We’ll see what S2 brings.

Screen Shot 2016-04-06 at 21.44.36

Boomers I hadn’t watched the first series of this and I’m definitely regretting it now. Based around three baby boomer couples, this comedy is as well acted and well written as you’d imagine a BBC One comedy to be. You can always tell if something is a BBC One comedy if it uses the word “sex” as a punchline and this definitely falls into that category. It is great though, nice and light, unobtrusive and an easy, funny watch.

Two Doors Down I never saw the original pilot episode from many moons ago but having watched the series I’d rate it as a solid and enjoyable comedy, . Admittedly though, I probably wouldn’t have committed to watching this without the inclusion of a gay couple in it (again, I’m a terrible cliché, I know)

EastEnders this month saw the return of Johnny complete with a new head. The character means an awful lot to me for obvious reasons so I was eager to see his on screen revival. I think it’s fair to say I was far more accepting of Johnny 2.0 than most (he was slated), but it’s a soap opera – people take time to settle in and I believe he now has, although his ForlornFace™ did wear thin after a while.

First Dates this has been a runaway success for Channel 4 in the past eighteen months but Christ on a bike guys, sort out your scheduling. The number of shifts in day and time is verging on ridiculous; show it some love!!!!1!

Blue Eyes This continues to be great Swedish political thriller, with an oddly relevant undertone – the rise of a far right, racist group both politically speaking in an establishment sense and in terms of terror. Adam Lundgren (my future husband of Don’t Ever Wipe Tears fame) is in it and I’m struggling to adjust to him being the bad guy.

People vs. OJ Simpson everyone seemed to be talking about this and rightly so. Flawless from start to finish, this never dropped the ball and there were no weak episodes – incredibly surprising with a US drama or comedy, given most series have at least two! I did read, however, one person critiquing the presentation of Simpson as a snivelling, weak man rather than the strong, tall, charismatic God he was in reality and I think they had a valid point.

 

 

The Readlist: March 2016

Tender Is The Night by F. Scott Fitzgerald

My only exposure to Fitzgerald was studying The Great Gatsby at GCSE. I had purchased a couple of his books in a set at a discount at one point, and this is the first one I’ve gotten round to reading. This particular novel comes some twelve years after Gatsby and is viewed as semi-autobiographical, with parallels to his relationship with Zelda.

Tender Is The Night is at points difficult to follow, with so many characters already in play at the beginning I had no idea who anyone was between readings, or their relevance. To be honest I’m not entirely sure Fitzgerald did either. Eventually the number of characters is whittled down and the majority of the book deals with Dick, his wife Nicole and Rosemary’s influence.

tumblr_m5zd8qXl0Q1rrnekqo1_1280.jpgThe time frame jumps around a fair bit and its only deep into reading a chapter that this becomes clear. Equally, many scenes are over written. Fitzgerald is a master of description but there’s often a lot of fluff too. Yet, his presentation of people is second to none. They are presented as mundane and fickle, and his understanding of the human psyche is tremendous. Fitzgerald also pinpoints the exact moments that a relationship changes or perception of people change perfectly – the one thing that causes a relationship or a friendship to change irreparably is crystal clear.

The women have character and personality and their own thoughts, although, admittedly, I’m not sure it would pass the Bechdel test. The presentation of mental illness and its understanding puts many people in the twenty first century to shame, however.

It’s a long novel, split into three books. Reading the first can seem like a drag with so much going on that seems increasingly irrelevant, but the whole things comes into its own from Book II onwards.

There’s so many moments and passages that I should have highlighted or marked as I read through, but here’s just a couple of things that resonated with me:

“once I knew a man who worked two years on the brain of an armadillo, with the idea that he would sooner or later know more about the brain of an armadillo than any one. I kept arguing with him that he was not really pushing out the extension of the human range – it was too arbitrary. And sure enough, when he sent his work to the medical journal they refused it – they had just accepted a thesis by another man on the same subject” Book II, Chapter 1

“There were other patients to see: an American girl of fifteen who had been brought up on the basis that childhood was intended to be all fun – his visit was provoked by the fact that she had just hacked off all her hair with a nail scissors. There was nothing much to be done for her – a family history of neurosis and nothing stable in her past to build on. The father, normal and conscientious himself, had tried to protect a nervous brood from life’s troubles and had succeeded merely in preventing them from developing powers of adjustment to life’s inevitable surprises” Book II, Chapter 14

51pBVXbUFqL._SX323_BO1,204,203,200_The Moth: 50 Extraordinary True Stories

I’ve dipped in and out of The Moth podcast for years – it’s not one I’m subscribed to but I always enjoy it when I listen and when I was wandering around a book warehouse closing down there was a pile of these in the corner so nabbed one.  It’s a collection of stories told on The Moth – the creme de la creme, apparently – arranged into broad themes. Obviously some of the magic is lost when you the stories aren’t being delivered out loud but this is a really nice, light read and something you can dip in and out of.

The one overwhelming feeling I had while reading it though was that I haven’t lived. I haven’t got stories like these to tell, I still live in my childhood cul-de-sac and do the same routine everyday. Should I be living more? How do I do this? Am I meant to somehow arrange these often bizarre opportunities for myself, or wait for them to come to me? Obviously, being nineteen I *shouldn’t* necessarily have experienced life in all its forms and yet I did pine for some adventure while reading this book. I suppose that’s natural, but mentally speaking I’ve always been obsessed with the future. Every single moment I’m always thinking “will this make a good memory?” “will this make a good anecdote?” “how is this relevant to me in five or ten years?”. I haven’t got much of a past to dwell on, and my present is so boring that I can only sit and stew hoping the future will be better, more productive and more ‘fun’. Am I making excuses? Probably. The change starts with you, after all. We’ll see.

The Circle by Dave Eggers

I was going to write that this is clearly an important novel, but now I’m less sure. To Kill A Mockingbird is an ‘important’ novel, representing a slice of life that should never be forgotten. However, it’s set in the 1930s and was written in the 1950s (published 1960).

The Circle, on the otherhand, is an incredibly *relevant* novel. Only viewing it from a future perspective (here we go again!) would you be able to judge it as important, but I can easily imagine it being viewed in the same way George Orwell’s 1984 or Animal Farm are now. It’s set around San Francisco and the all encompassing and ubiquitous ‘Circle’ company which of course has many paralleScreen Shot 2016-03-27 at 15.00.56ls with Google, but combines elements of all our large technology corporations such as Facebook, Paypal and Amazon. It’s an odd one to try and place time-wise as Facebook is acknowledged but was at some point subsumed by The Circle, as I imagine were all the other companies.

Likes are smiles, dislikes are frowns, and posts are zings but everything feels very real throughout the novel. It’s all just one step away from where we stand now and as The Circle’s influence and power grows it questions our ability to almost be ‘brainwashed’, to accept things gradually and then wholeheartedly. Everyone is connected and people believe they have real influence – does ‘frowning’ against a far flung Government’s human right record help the issue? Circlers seem to think so.

For children growing up now they’ve never experienced a world without wi-fi, social media and easy access to knowledge and items online and a huge prevalence of internet connected devices. I grew up on the fringes – I’m older than Google, but remember a time at school where computers were still a commodity, and you used to huddle in groups around them to use Paint or PowerPoint. We didn’t get one at home until 2005 – I was 9, and it was an incredibly old model which a family friend was getting rid of – and I didn’t have home internet access until around 18 months later. Things were changing when I left, with the IT suites being completely overhauled and smart whiteboards and overhead projectors installed in every classroom.

And yet, I feel like technology has crept up on me and that it’s too late to turn back now. Of course, it *is* because so much of our daily lives relies on it but I’ve reached a point now where I don’t care. Some people obsess over our internet privacy, our lives being published for all to see and our data collected by firms. If I’d been worried about that to begin with I might have been more careful but now I have more online accounts than I care to remember (many of which lie dormant and forgotten, each company and site still holding my personal data and information) and more knowledge of my likes and preferences than I probably have. Algorithms and the like aren’t perfect yet of course, and neither are recommendations on streaming services and shopping sites, but they soon will be. It’s a reached a point now where I don’t care what I share and who knows what.

Although I rarely post on Facebook, The Circle encourages each of its users to be as active as possible – trolls can’t hide as each profile has a social security number and ID aligned with it, so there’s anonymity, and there’s rankings for your social performance. The way its presented in the book is initially hugely overwhelming, and as more screens and devices are given to Mae you feel breathless just reading it as she tries to keep tabs on everything that’s going on. However, she soon reaches a saturation point where she becomes used to it and doesn’t question its impact. That job lies with her ex-boyfriend and parents but Mae is oblivious to their warnings, she’s rising up The Circle chain and begins to have real influence on the companies direction. She believes that privacy shouldn’t exist, knowledge should be collective and everything accessible. Nothing should be deleted, everything exists in the cloud and is accessible and on record.

At each stage an argument is presented to show that The Circle’s next development is only seeking to improve our lives, to stop crime, expand democracy and help alleviate problems. It all seems reasonable, but its only when you take a step back you can see the true picture.

To think that The Circle was written four years ago seems astonishing – its ahead of its time, incredibly relevant and a must read. It acts as a warning but I doubt we’ll heed it.

A film adaptation is currently in the works.

Currently reading: The Man In The High Castle

Long reads & articles

A little light on these this month.

Zoe££a How Youtubers are stringing their fans along.

Copycat What do you do when you discover someone’s been republishing your books in their name?

In Man’s Image Imgur doesn’t get near enough as much press as other social media sites, but its community loves it. This traces its history.

Mulhernism Stephen Mulhern has been on telly for as long as I can remember, hosting CITV when I was a wee boy. I even had a Stephen Mulhern branded magic trick case, I seem to remember (?!)

The Watchlist: March 2016

I feel like I’ve watched a fair bit this month, so I won’t go into too much detail on everything…

Films

Populaire

This is a lovely, almost stereotypically, French film and a perfect Sunday afternoon watch. It doesn’t ask for much from you and you know where it’s going from the beginning and it does indeed go there. But a film about a clumsy girl who finds her calling by being a speed-typist? What’s not to love.

The Reluctant Fundamentalist

This is based on the novel of the same name with the film rights snapped up *before* the book was even released on sale. Based around 9/11 and the fallout and questions it creates for one young Pakistani living the American high life; it flopped at the pictures but it’s not overly terrible. Undoubtedly it thinks of itself as a bit worthy and I didn’t come away from it feeling particuarly validated by its existence, spending most of the time staring at Riz Ahmed’s perfect nose.

026-anomalisa-161-feature

Anomalisa

I didn’t know what to expect from this film but somehow I’d built it up in my mind to be some great watch. I’m not entirely sure it delivers on that point, but it’s certainly different enough to warrant a viewing . The use of stop motion animation takes a couple of minutes to get to used to but it’s nice to see this method used well to create an adult animated film. It also means I get to tick ‘stop motion sex scene’ off my to-watch list. The use of the same voice and face for everyone seen through the eyes of our protagonist Michael is a genius touch and very jarring – then along pops Lisa, the only person in the whole world who looks and sounds different and is the light Michael has been looking for.

Bridesmaids

I’ve been aware of this film for ages but put it in the ‘nice for 20 something females’ box and left it at that but surprise!* I really enjoyed it. A great ensemble cast and I finally learnt that Wilson Philips were a band and not just one person (I’m basically a foetus, okay?). *not at all surprising

What If

Look, it’s Daniel Radcliffe not being Harry Potter! This is a gentle romantic comedy which is surprising in absolutely no way whatsoever. It’s a shame that so many modern films rely on technology to further the plot – it’s to be expected, and you’d imagine two people *would* text each other but seeing an old iOS on screen is an oddly jarring experience. I think films should move to using more generic Android devices to alleviate this issue.

Screen Shot 2016-04-03 at 12.33.07.png

A Most Violent Year

This has been on my to-watch list for a while and I’m glad it delivered. I expected a higher body count, thinking it would be a gentle thriller as one man rallies against the huge levels of crime in NYC. I imagine I was getting my wires crossed with Inherent Vice, another film that was out at the same time. AMVY focuses on one man (played by Oscar Issac) as he tries to build his oil business focussing on quality of product and customer service, something the other providers couldn’t care two jots about. It all comes down to morals – recommended.

Television & Streaming

boschamazonBosch

Some streaming exclusive shows such as OITNB and House Of Cards on Netflix and Transparent on Prime seem very well known whereas I’ve always felt alone in watching and enjoying Bosch. It’s an American crime series based on the books by Michael Connelly and is delivered spectacularly – think CSI but not dull. I really enjoyed Series 1 and was counting down the days until Series 2 was available. It did deliver, with a good number of “ohhhhh!” moments and it was great to see the character of Deputy Chief Irving come into his own. Unfortunately I do feel that Amy Aquino as Lieutentant Billets and Jerry Edgar as Bosch’s partner Jamie Hector were criminally (forgive the phrasing) underused this series – I’d love to see more of their lives in the now commissioned Series 3.

Screen Shot 2016-03-23 at 21.04.12.pngThe finale felt a little rushed and this might be down to them having a little too much plot to deal with. The point about Bosch’s mother, which was featured a few times in S1, became a big part of the finale even though it had been barely mentioned throughout the entirety of S2.

Also, Bosch’s house is shitmazing. Perched on the top of a mountain, it offers amazing panoramic views of LA.

Transparent

Initially I described Series 2 as ‘plodding’ but I grew to like its pace by the end. It’s undeniable that each of the characters is deeply, deeply flawed, but then aren’t we all? We’re not here to follow one person and feel empathy for them, we’re just watching each character continually muck up their own lives. In a pleasant twist though, each major altercation and life changing event isn’t spelt out plainly on screen. You see the build up and the aftermath but not necessarily the moment itself. The historical flashbacks seemed odd at first but as is always the way with these things, their raison d’être was clear by the end and proved to be a wonderful touch. This is a definite binge-watch programme, if you don’t mind the plodding nature of it.

transparent-recap-episode-207-the-book-of-life-2

Highston

Can you tell I currently have a Prime trial subscription?! Amazon premiere pilots of possible Prime productions before delivering entire series and I can see a lot of potential in this. Highston focuses on 19 year old Highston Liggets and his host of imaginary celebrity friends only he can see. It’s very charming although I can see that it might suffer from having too many recurring characters in the long run. Celebrities playing versions of themselves in sitcoms is nothing new and this doesn’t try to reinvent the wheel but I hope it becomes a cult hit. I just hope I recognise who half the celebrities are and it doesn’t become too US-centric (the pilot featured Shaquille O’Neal?)

Please Like Me

I feel part of some secret club watching this in the UK. A minor hit in Australia (not helped by some very poor scheduling of series 2) and a minor hit over in the US too, this will probably never be shown on UK television, which is a real shame – it has cult hit written all over it. I think I worked out that the last Australian TV that I watched was Round The Twist in my childhood, so it’s bizarre to me that we don’t import more Australian originals for British TV other than the occasional Aus version of a game or talent show. You could easily fill hours worth of BBC Two with the decent stuff.

This series continues the story of Josh and Arnold, but you never feel that the story is *just* about them. The fringe characters of Clare and Mae have as much a place in my heart as Josh does and each character is intricately written. They are people and they’re real and they’re charming.  The way it deals with mental health and depression is startlingly real (Josh’s mother suffers from bi-polar in real life) – PLM just seems to ‘get’ life. While other sitcoms put characters in ridiculous scenarios and love triangles PLM presents everything in a realistic manner. Yes, odd things happen but it’s never melodramatic – it’s genuine in purpose and delivery.

New girlfriend Ella’s overwhelming similarity to Niamh is a nice touch but can feel a little suffocating, which I suppose, is tantamount to her well written character and her annoying personality. And there’s John the dog who deserves every animal acting award going.

There’s some really great moments in this series, notably one involving a car in episode 8 and another in episode 9 on an observation wheel. There’s no word yet on a series 4.

plm3_ep5_sc7_0055_bt

Happy Valley

Everybody seems to have been raving about this, and although good I’m not entirely sure it’s as perfect as everyone makes out. A incredibly great cast and the juxtaposition of both the mundanity of home life and the day to day work of a police officer is what makes HV so good. S2 probably suffered from a little too much plot and a rushed finale – would the chief detective really leapt to his conclusion as quickly as that? Many bits were summed up and ended with just one line in the finale and some never referenced. What was the true relevance of the gang member found hanged in a tree? Was the illegal biscuit woman’s life all plain sailing? What is the Gallagher daughter and trainee police officer actually doing with her life and her alcoholism? What happened with Neville Longbottom?

Other bits

The Great Sport Relief Bake Off a convoluted and bizarre way of getting celebrities to bake cakes (it’s a sport!!!!1!) but thoroughly enjoyable. Never forget Maddie Hill’s “pinch of salt” faux pas.

Crashing I watched the first episode of this after seeing some chatter on Twitter. It did nothing for me, so I’m yet to come back to it.

Thirteen I also watched the first episode of this after seeing some chatter on Twitter. It did nothing for me, so I’m yet to come back to it.

The People vs. OJ Simpson 40 minutes long one week and 50 the next – I’ve never felt more sympathy for the people who schedule BBC Two. Sadly this month I discovered the result of the trial due to a newspaper front page framed in the background of a scene in Bosch, having managed to avoid the news about them finding a knife (?) linked to the case, which was in the papers a few weeks back. Ah, well. Clearly it was made to be viewed with knowledge of the outcome in mind.

First Dates YESSSSSS. God, I love First Dates with all of my heart and watching it on catch up means I get to skip the two minute long opening each week.

Blondie’s New York & the Making of Parallel Lines I haven’t watched a music documentary in ages and I’m glad I took the plunge with this one, tracing the story of Blondie (who I must play on the radio at least four times a week) and their huge commercial success. I also might fancy one of the guitarists (in the archive footage clearly, not as a grey haired man).

EastEnders There’s been some great episodes this month – alcoholic Phil is a masterpiece and Aunt Babe continues her twisted, manipulative edict. And Johnny returns in April – hurrah!

Doctor Who: Boom Town Talking of Aunt Babe, I decided on a whim to watch an episode of S1 of new-Who and plumped for this. I was pleasantly surprised to discover I still knew much of the script by heart, not having watched this for years! That’s what comes of having a book of the S1 scripts as a boy.

20120107131214-2857e982